6/1/2006 3:25:11 PM
Appearance / Description of Object(s)The object was a black square. Perfectly black and perfectly square. There was no reflectivity. There was no noise associated with the object. It's dimensions and proportions remained consistent as it ascended out of view. There was no surface details, appendages, textures, or features. There was no tether attached or assembly connected to the object. It was simply a black square. Size of Object(s)There was no frame of reference to guage the relative distance or size of the object. From my vantage point, it appeared to be roughly the size of one quarter of a thumbnail if you extend your arm straight out in front of you. The size decreased as it ascended. Distance to Object(s) & AltitudeThere was no frame of reference for the distance or altitude Description of Area / SurroundingsUrban area, apartment complex. Object *appeared* to be directly above Interstate 65 which runs north and south through Louisville Kentucky. There were telephone lines running directly above us, but the object was well beyond these as it ascended into a cloud bank.. Entire area is heavilty urban. Full Description & DetailsI was visiting two friends that I have known over 20 years for a cookout on memorial day weekend. We typically get together Sunday because that is the only day each of us has off from work.
Can sighting be explained as any conventional man-made or natural object?The object was in clear view long enough that even during the sighting my friends and I went through a gambit of things it most certainly was NOT. I have not been able to come up with a rational explanation that suits me to explain what I saw. The aerodynamics of the object were not consistent with the principles of flight. Squares that do not make sound are not supposed to be in the sky. There was no reflectivity which suggests unless it was painted, a non metallic surface. I spoke with a physics friend of mine that informed me of a phenomenon that can occur under certain conditions near power lines where a parcel of air refracts light and can create an effect similar to what I observed but this potential explanation doesnt satisfy me or replicate the object exactly. The object was solid and had mass and area. It was not energy, or light refractivity. It's vector of acension altered slightly as it moved away. Witness BackgroundBA in Psychology currently working for the Census Bureau Views on UFOs, before and after sightingI have always believe in UFOs and read about them over the years extensively. I had always wanted to see a UFO . After the sighting, I am ambivalent, I honestly wish I had not seen it, as Im beginning to understand the stigma associated with observing one and subseqently telling people about it. Other CommentsI actually wish a more conventional and rational explanation would surface for what the object is, I would gladly stand humbled and informed because the uncertainty is what disturbs me the most. What I saw wasnt supposed to bethere and in broad daylight for all to see.
Reported Sighting?YesReported To:Louisville international radar operatorName:Joshua VanceYour Location:Louisville, Ky USAAge:33 |